Complete, clear documentation bolsters your credibility.
“If it was not charted, it did not happen” may be a cliché, but it sums up the importance of properly and thoroughly charting medical records. Records are vital for providing care; however, once attorneys are involved, medical records also become the basis—and one of the most critical aspects—of medical malpractice defense.
Medical malpractice litigation is built around the patient’s medical records, which provide the only objective documentation of both the plaintiff’s condition and the care provided at a time when there was no conflict or other motivation to conceal or exaggerate the care provided. They also are critical in helping the provider recall events that occurred months or even years ago. Because it is the health care provider’s responsibility to document, medical records become extremely important in providing a defense.
As a result, judges and juries often consider medical records to be one of the most trustworthy and probative pieces of evidence in the case. Therefore, well-documented medical records provide the best defense for providers. The inverse is also true; poorly documented medical records may become strong evidence of an incompetent provider. Although poor records do not automatically show negligence, the patient’s attorney will use it to argue subpar care.
Go back to: “If it was not charted, it did not happen.” The patient’s attorney certainly will use this, or at least keep it in mind, when prosecuting the case. The patient’s attorney will attack the provider’s credibility by showing the incomplete records. During the provider’s deposition, the patient’s attorney may use skilled cross-examination to obtain the health care provider’s testimony of their recollection about the care provided. A few evidently unimportant details now become the focal point of the patient’s allegations and, therefore, the jury deliberations. The patient’s attorney will argue that if the physician or nurse had provided a specific treatment, then the patient’s injuries would not have happened. If the patient’s attorney can show that important information is missing from the records, then it is not a far leap for the jury to find that the missing information supports the patient’s claims.
This attack on credibility may occur even if the information is not necessarily missing. For example, many systems for electronic health records have prefilled data. Often, the provider entering the patient’s information will not update or change the prefilled data. It then becomes difficult to argue that certain assessments occurred because the same word-for-word language is used throughout the patient’s record. It should also be noted that when dealing with electronic health records, parties can hire an expert to conduct a metadata audit, which will provide a complete analysis of every keystroke, the timing of the entries, who made the entries, and how long the document was open for review and revision. If it is shown that the medical record was altered, it can expose the provider to punitive damages and a medical board investigation.
Neither patient nor physician wants or expects to get involved in civil litigation arising from the medical care provided. Unfortunately, it happens. When it does, the provider will be grateful that they took care to follow best practices in the record documentation by charting timely, thoroughly, and consistently.
Wager is an attorney in the Columbus, Ohio, office of Reminger Co, LPA. She specializes in malpractice defense and insurance litigation. Please contact her at awager@reminger.com with any feedback or comments on this column.
Malpractice Consult: What to know about direct examination of expert witnesses
December 4th 2023"In the 21st century, expert witnesses serve a vital role in presenting evidence to a jury. A good expert will be able to distill complex information into digestible elements the jurors can understand," writes Austin Richards, Esq.
Urology Malpractice: Kenton H. Steele, Esq, discusses expert witnesses from the attorney perspective
August 25th 2021“Their opinions do need to be credible and be honest, but there is some component of being able to walk a line between providing a candid, unbiased opinion, and knowing that you are retained to represent a specific side in that case,” says Kenton H. Steele, Esq.
Researchers evaluate data on priapism malpractice litigation
July 30th 2021“I think it's the responsibility of the physician to really take on educating and counseling and setting clear expectations and that way, when complications do arise, patients are better equipped, and they have a more favorable outcome,” says Ariana Matz, MD.